Gesamtzahl der Seitenaufrufe

Sonntag, 11. August 2013

Is The Worst Over For Annaly?


Disclosure: I am long AGNCMTGENLYWMC(More...)
The worst is over for the Annaly Capital Management (NLY) situation. At least, that is my opinion after covering the stock for some time. Following the most recent Q2 report, which I will discuss a bit here, I think the risk is to the upside from current levels. Those who follow my work and especially who own the stock realize that NLY has absolutely plummeted in 2013 in response to three key concerns. First was the fact that the Federal Reserve may slow or cease its mortgage asset purchases sometime this year. Second was the fear that rising interest rates will crush portfolio holdings of the mortgage real estate investment trusts (mREITs). Third, there have been some true issues with recent quarterly performance. In this article, I will discuss and put into perspective NLY's most recent quarter and lay out why I believe shares are undervalued and heading higher. After reviewing the quarterly report closely and being asked by several readers my overall opinion, I'd like to go over the key takeaways that investors, particularly those on the sidelines wondering if they should get in, should focus on when deciding for themselves if the negative price action in the stock is over.
Key Headline Statistics From Earnings; It Wasn't All That Bad
Unfortunately, a lot of traders and big money managers move stocks based on the headline numbers only. In essence, they shoot first, ask questions later. While I agree that the headline statistics, which for most companies are generally top and bottom lines as well as any future guidance, are important, they can be misleading at times. Overall, it looked pretty good. NLY reported a GAAP net income for the quarter of $1.6 billion or $1.71 per average common share as compared to GAAP net income of $870.3 million or $0.90 per average common share for the first quarter 2013. These numbers are even better compared to the comparable 2012 quarter, which was reported to be a net loss of $91 million or $0.10 a share. While this news is clearly good, we really need to look under the hood to understand where we are going from here.
The Spread on Interest Rates; Crucial To Profits
With interest rates moving wildly during the quarter ending in June, I had expected the interest rate spread for mREITs to actually improve as I predicted that the cost of borrowing would rise at a slower pace than the rise in yield being returned from investments. For the case of NLY, this proved to be true. The interest rate spread saw a slight increase quarter over quarter. To my pleasant surprise, NLY reported a net interest rate spread of 0.98%, which was a slight but meaningful change from the first quarter, which was reported to be 0.91%. This was a great sign for those who believe that the company may be stabilizing, but unfortunately, is still well below the 1.54% interest rate spread from the comparable quarter last year.
Let's look at this a bit more to see where the asset yields and costs of funds stand. First, NLY's asset yield on its interest earning portfolio for the quarter was 2.51%, compared to 2.37% for the first quarter. Not surprisingly, this is much lower than the yield in the comparable quarter of 2012. Although it is still diminished from 2012 levels, it was a marked improvement from Q1 2013 of 6% Furthermore, NLY's average cost of funds (derived from the cost of repurchase agreements, other debt and interest rate swaps) increased 7 basis points to 1.53% for the second quarter, up from 1.46% for the first quarter, primarily due to higher average costs associated with entering into longer dated swaps during the quarter.
To put this all into perspective, the cost to borrow rose but the average yield on assets rose at higher absolute amount, leading to a higher interest rate spread quarter over quarter. Thus, earnings potential as a result of the interest rate spread has started to rebound. This statistic is one of the first things I examine when looking at the performance of any mREIT. Overall, it wasn't that bad, but still very weak versus 2012.
Is The Dividend Affordable?
While we have known about the declared dividend for a while when it was announced in June, let's look under the hood of this number a bit. I felt NLY could easily afford the dividend, but I was worried. The dividend of $0.40 per share was down 11% from the last dividend of $0.45 per share declared in the first quarter. It is also 27% lower than the Q2 2012 dividend of $0.55. It should be noted that this number was actually better than expected, as it was widely believed that the dividend was going to be cut to $0.35 or even as low as $0.25.
Looking under the hood a bit more, it would appear that the dividend was well within NLY's estimated taxable income per share of $0.47. Therefore, NLY did have sufficient cash and earnings to pay it. At a current share price of $11.60, this represents a still sizable yield that NLY has been known for, currently an annualized yield of 13.8%. It is important to note that this dividend can certainly fluctuate moving forward, but now that interest rate movements have calmed down, it is likely that we can expect this dividend to stay at current levels for the time being, if not improve.
Book Value A Critical Measure
I recently opined on the significance of book value for mREITs. Essentially, you want to buy when the stock trades below book value and sell when stock price gets too far ahead of book value. This assumes that book value will remain relatively stable, or in the case of buying below book value, will rise. With the extreme volatility over the last few months, quarter end book value was anyone's guess. But my readers know that I was adamant that NLY was probably trading well below book value. Well, as it turns out, book value dropped as expected, but as of June 30th the stock was indeed trading below tangible book value.
On June 30th, the stock was trading around $12.50. The book value was reported to be $13.03, which was a $2.16 drop from the end of Q1. However, it also meant that the stock was trading about 5% below book value, indicating at the time it was a good buy. Much of this decline was due to the volatility in mortgage-backed securities (MBS), and as such many investors and traders were just dumping the stock for fear that it could have been much worse. Considering the stabilization in MBS prices and interest rates over the last few weeks, we can likely safely conclude that book value has stabilized as well. Therefore, it is likely we are still trading at a significant discount to book value, and thus we still have a buying opportunity in the name.
What About The Role of The Federal Reserve?
Despite all of the volatility in the last few months, NLY has shown it can stand on its own two feet. For now, the worst is over. It was a transitional quarter and being a shareholder of mREITs has been painful since the beginning of 2013. I began accumulating and completing a position in NLY the whole way down. During this time, a lot of criticisms I received were surrounding the Fed and how devastating its exit will be. Upon the release of the June FOMC meeting minutes, it is clear that every member except one had advocated for an extension of the Fed's current economic stimulus program. This past week the Fed met once again, and their accommodative stance remains in place because the economic data just isn't that strong. The Fed simply is not advocating for tapering of asset purchases ahead of stable economic news and/or meeting the economic goals laid out when the program was announced, despite what occasional members may state. To me, the fears of this issue that punished the mREITs are simply unfounded right now. Among the most important takeaways is that the FOMC was adamant that the low-rate situation, or the zero rate interest policy, will not change until the unemployment rate drops to 6.5%. This is not likely until late 2014 or 2015.
Conclusion
The quarter was a significant improvement over the first quarter 2013. The headline earnings were pretty strong overall and showed improvement quarter over quarter. Investors should focus on two of the most important items to consider with the mREITs. First is the interest rate spread. It rose nearly 10% quarter over quarter. This is a crucial positive, especially for those who have been on the sidelines waiting to see if the company and subsequently the stock were stable. Right now, it appears the worst is over. To be certain, we should recognize that book value, the measure which should properly determine the share price of your mREIT and be used as a basis for deciding whether to buy or sell, was above the stock price at the end of the quarter. However, it declined significantly to $13.03 in just three months. As such, shares will be trading at fair value once they reach about $13.00 a share. Given that interest rates have stabilized and the company has undergone two transitional quarters, book value has likely stabilized around the $13.00 mark. Therefore, I believe shares are certainly still undervalued.

Donnerstag, 8. August 2013

The company on Thursday posted net income of $10.1bn, up from $5.1bn in the second quarter of 2012.



August 8, 2013 3:40 pm

Fannie Mae doubles profits to send further $10bn to US Treasury


A surge in US house prices doubled profits at the bailed-out mortgage finance groupFannie Mae in the second quarter, meaning it will send a further $10.2bn back to the US Treasury in the coming weeks.
The company on Thursday posted net income of $10.1bn, up from $5.1bn in the second quarter of 2012.

More

ON THIS STORY

ON THIS TOPIC

IN PROPERTY

The latest payment will mean that the company, which was put into government conservatorship amid the financial crisis of 2008, has returned $105.3bn in dividends to the US taxpayer, on bailout funds of $117.1bn.
“The significant and rapid increase in house prices resulted in a substantial reduction in our loss reserves,” said Timothy Mayopoulos, chief executive of Fannie Mae, on a conference call with reporters on Thursday.
With national home prices up 12 per cent year-on-year, Fannie no longer has to set aside so much money to cover potential losses on the mortgage securities it guarantees.
The company’s loss reserves fell $7.1bn between March and June to $53.1bn, down $24bn from their 2011 peak when a glut of foreclosed homes was pushing house prices down.
About 72 per cent of Fannie Mae’s portfolio is now backed by loans written since 2009, when it sharply tightened lending criteria.
These new standards, plus the improvement in the US economy, reduced the proportion of delinquent loans in the portfolio to 2.77 per cent from 3.02 per cent at the end of March and 3.53 per cent a year ago.
The US Treasury sweeps in effect all of Fannie Mae’s profits as dividends on its senior preferred stock investment in the company, an arrangement that holders of junior preferred shares are challenging in a lawsuit.
The arrangement means Fannie and its sister company Freddie Mac cannot repay the government and build capital that could then be used to return value to private investors.
On Wednesday, Freddie also reported strong earnings and, like Fannie, could have returned as much to the Treasury as it received in bailout cash by around the end of this year.
News of their bumper profits comes as political debate turns to the question of what to do with the companies, and how to recast the federal government’s role in the US mortgage market. President Barack Obama this week threw his weight behind a plan to wind them both down and replace them with a more limited government effort to insure private mortgage investors against catastrophic losses.
While the debate over its future rages, Fannie is emphasising how its work supports the availability of mortgages in the US, including for homeowners where negative equity might otherwise prevent them from refinancing their loan.
It has backed $14.5tn of loans on single-family homes since 2009, it says. However, its regulator, the Federal Home Finance Agency, requires the company to shrink its portfolio each year, in the absence of permanent reform plans from Congress.

Mittwoch, 7. August 2013

Obama will den US-Hypothekenmarkt umkrempeln

Obama will den US-Hypothekenmarkt umkrempeln

    Von NICK TIMIRAOS und CAROL E. LEE
Getty Images
Amerikanischer Häusermarkt: US-Präsident Barack Obama will nicht, dass die großen Hypothekenfinanzierer Steuergeld verzocken.
US-Präsident Barack Obama hat am Dienstag die größte Reform des amerikanischen Hypothekenmarktes seit Jahrzehnten angekündigt. Ihr Kernpunkt: Die beiden riesigen halbstaatlichen Immobilienfinanzierer Fannie Mae FNMA +1,99% und Freddy Mac sollen in ihrer jetzigen Form verschwinden und durch stärker privatwirtschaftlich getragene Hypothekenbanken ersetzt werden.
Associated Press
US-Präsident Barack Obama bei seiner Rede am Dienstag.
Mit seinem Vorstoß begibt sich Obama auf politisches dünnes Eis. Der amerikanische Hypothekenmarkt hat ein Volumen von 10 Billionen US-Dollar und gilt als kritischer Bereich der US-Wirtschaft. Wenn die Abgeordneten im September aus der Sommerpause zurückkehren, dürfte dieses Thema hitzige Debatten im Kongress entfachen.
Fannie Mae und Freddie MacFMCC +1,43% bieten Amerikanern Immobilienkredite mit 30-jähriger Laufzeit und festem Zins an und übernehmen in den USA die wichtige Funktion, Rentenfonds und andere Investoren als Geldgeber in den Hypothekenmarkt zu locken. Vor fünf Jahren hatte die US-Regierung die Unternehmen mit Steuergeld vor der Pleite retten müssen. Seitdem hat Washington fast 188 Milliarden Dollar investiert, damit sie zahlungsfähig bleiben.
Jetzt aber steigen in den USA die Hauspreise wieder und davon profitieren die beiden Hypothekengiganten. 132 Milliarden Dollar Dividende haben die beiden Unternehmen an das US-Finanzministerium ausgeschüttet; 188 Milliarden Dollar sind die Anteilsscheine wert, welche die US-Regierung ihnen einst abgekauft hat.
Für Obama ist das Grund genug, die beiden Unternehmen grundlegend auf den Prüfstand zu stellen. Er will auf keinen Fall, dass Fannie und Freddie den quasi-staatlichen Status wiedererlangen, den sie vor der großen Finanzkrise hatten. Damals hätten die beiden Hypothekenfinanzierer in guten Zeiten ordentlich Gewinne gemacht und gewusst, dass „die Steuerzahler würden übernehmen müssen, wenn ihre Wetten schiefgehen", sagte Obama in seiner Rede. Wie Zocker hätten sich die Unternehmen verhalten, „und das war falsch".

Noch sind die Details der Hypothekenidee unklar

Eine konkrete Alternative lieferte Obama jedoch nicht. Vielmehr beließ er es dabei zu betonen, dass er nur ein Hypothekensystem unterstützen werde, das der Mittelschicht Zugang zu langfristigen Festzinshypotheken biete. Solche Darlehen empfinden Amerikaner regelrecht als Geburtsrecht, sie bedürfen aber einer staatlichen Absicherung, damit sie weiterhin großflächig für die Bürger angeboten werden können.
Künftig soll sich die Rolle des Staates auf ein Mindestmaß begrenzen, während „die private Kreditvergabe das Rückgrat des Häusermarktes sein sollte", sagte Obama.
Allerdings steckt – wie in jedem großen Gesetzesvorschlag – der Teufel im Detail. Viele Einzelheiten der Reformidee hat die US-Regierung noch gar nicht ausgearbeitet. Zum Teil sind die Vorschläge auch widersprüchlich. So fordert Obama einerseits einen Hypothekenmarkt, der sich viel stärker als jetzt auf privatem Kapital basieren soll. Andererseits verdammt er die Kultur, übermäßige Risiken einzugehen, und appellierte in seiner Rede an die Politik, solche Exzesse zu unterbinden. Zugleich sollten Politiker dafür sorgen, dass mehr kreditwürdige Bürger an Immobiliendarlehen kommen.
Viele Kreditgeber schrecken seit dem Kollaps des Immobilienmarktes davor zurück, ihre Rahmenbedingungen für die Darlehensvergabe zu lockern. Das hat dazu geführt, dass viele Kreditnehmer die von der Regierung abgesicherten Hypotheken für besonders attraktiv halten.
Dass Obama nun Private stärker einbeziehen will, gilt unter Experten als löblich. Einige sind jedoch auch skeptisch. „Privates Kapital wird teurer sein als das derzeitige Modell und es wird die Zyklen am Häusermarkt verstärken, indem es die Kreditvergabe in Zeiten des Abschwungs drosselt", sagt etwa Jim Vogel, Hypotheken-Analyst beim Finanzdienstleister FTN Financial. Zudem zeige die Vergangenheit, dass private Geldgeber sich häufig genau dann aus dem Markt zurückziehen, wenn dieser zu überhitzen droht.
Kontakt zum Autor: redaktion@wallstreetjournal.de

Montag, 5. August 2013

Javelin Mortgage book value declines nearly 18% in Q2 • 12:31 AM

Javelin Mortgage book value declines nearly 18% in Q2 • 12:31 AM
  • Javelin Mortgage (JMI): Q2 taxable REIT income of approximately $6.5M  vs. $5.8M in Q1.
  • Book value per share of $15.12 on June 30 is off 17.8% from Q1's end. Today's closing price of $13.27 is a 12.2% discount to June 30 book.
  • Average net interest margin in Q2 of 1.75% off 21 bps from Q1.
  • Agency MBS portfolio of $1.8B up from $1.1B in Q1, average non-agency MBS portfolio of $226.7M up from $136.8M in Q1 ($113M equity raise in Q2).
  • Leverage ratio of 9.28:1 vs. 8.04:1 in Q1. (PR)

With this evidence and two transitional quarters behind us, let's be honest -- AGNC is a buy at these level

Disclosure: I am long AGNCMTGENLYWMC(More...)
Let's look at the reality of the American Capital Agency (AGNC) situation. It has plummeted in 2013, which has primarily been in response to three key concerns. First was the fact that the Federal Reserve may slow or cease its mortgage asset purchases sometime this year. Second was the fear that rising interest rates will crush portfolio holdings of the mortgage real estate investment trusts (mREITS). Third, there have been some true issues with quarterly performances.
In this article, I will discuss and put into perspective AGNC's most recent quarter and lay out why I believe shares are undervalued and heading higher. I most recently opined on the stock in July when it got hammered after a better-than-expected jobs number showing that the market added 195,000 jobs in June. That day, when AGNC was trading down 7.5% at $20.21, I came out with a call to buy the panic selling. After reviewing the quarterly report closely and being asked by several readers my overall opinion, I'd like to go over the key takeaways that investors should focus on to honestly assess if my decision to buy this stock on the way down was wise.
Key Headline Statistics From Earnings -- To Be Honest, It Was Awful-Looking
A lot of traders move stocks based on the headline numbers only. While I agree those are important as they give you an indication of the company's performance, they can be misleading at times. However, I would be remiss if I did not provide them. Overall, it looked pretty ugly at first. AGNC reported a nasty $2.37 comprehensive loss per common share, comprised of $4.61 in net income per common share as well as a $6.98 other comprehensive loss per common share. This equates to an overall loss of $936 million for the quarter. While the news left a lot to be desired, we really need to look under the hood to understand where we are going from here.
The All-Important Spread on Interest Rates
With interest rates moving wildly during the quarter ending in June, I had honestly expected the interest rate spread to actually improve as I saw the cost of borrowing rise slower than the yield being returned from investments. Well, I was wrong. The interest rate spread was essentially stagnant. To my surprise, AGNC reported a net interest rate spread of 1.86%. Basically, it didn't change from the first quarter at all, which was reported 1.87%. If we exclude TBA dollar roll income, then AGNC's net spread was 1.49% -- essentially the same as Q1, which was reported as 1.51%.
Let's look at this a bit more to see where the assets and yields stand. First, AGNC's asset yield on its agency security portfolio for the quarter was 2.92%, compared to 2.80% for the first quarter. The annualized weighted average yield on the agency security portfolio was 2.63% for the current quarter, compared to 2.64% for the prior quarter, backing out the amortization catch-up payments. Overall, AGNC's average asset yield reported as of June 30, 2013, was 2.71%, a four-basis-point decrease from 2.75% as of March 31, 2013. Furthermore, AGNC's average cost of funds (derived from the cost of repurchase agreements, other debt and interest rate swaps) increased 15 basis points to 1.43% for the second quarter, from 1.28% for the first quarter, due to higher average swap costs associated with entering into longer dated swaps during the quarter. As a result, the average cost of funds as of June 30, 2013, increased 15 basis points to 1.47% from 1.32% as of March 31, 2013.
To put this all into perspective, the cost to borrow rose but the average yields did as well. Thus, earnings potentials as a result from the interest rate spread alone have not changed. In fact, 1.5% for the overall spread is rather strong, though as investors we want this number to be as high as possible. This statistic is one of the first things I examine when looking the performance of any mREIT. Overall, it wasn't that bad, but I expected the spread to widen.
The Dividend
While we have known about the declared dividend for a while when it was announced in June, let's look under the hood of this number a bit. To be honest, I didn't think AGNC could afford it. I was worried. The dividend of $1.05 per share was down 16% from the last dividend of $1.25 per share. It should be noted that this number was actually better than expected as it was widely believed that the dividend was going to be cut to a dollar or less. Some were opining it could drop as low as $0.80.
Looking under the hood now, it would appear that the dividend wasmore than AGNC's estimated taxable income per share of $1.04. However, digging a little deeper, we see that the $1.05 payment per share is less than AGNC's net spread and dollar roll income. That figure is approximately $1.15 per share. While the dividend paid was definitely up against this number, AGNC did have sufficient cash to pay it. At a current share price of $22.59, this represents a still sizable yield that AGNC has been known for of 18.6%. It is important to note that this dividend can certainly fluctuate moving forward, but now that interest rates movements have calmed down, it is likely that we can expect this dividend to stay at current levels for the time being.
It's Still All About Book Value
I recently opined on the significance of book value for mREITs. Essentially, you want to buy when the stock trades below book value and sell when stock price gets too far ahead of book value. This assumes that book value will remain relatively stable, or in the case of buying below book value, rising. With the extreme volatility over the last few months, book value was anyone's guess. But my readers know that I was adamant that AGNC was trading well below book value. Well, as it turns out, book value dropped as expected, but as of June 30 the stock was indeed trading well below tangible book value.
On June 30, the stock was trading around $23.00. The book value was reported to be $25.51, which was a $3.28 drop from the end of Q1. However, it also meant that the stock was trading about 12% below book value, indicating at the time it was a great buy. Much of this decline was due to the volatility in the mortgage-backed securities (MBS), and such many investors and traders we just dumping the stock for fear that it could have been much worse. Considering the stabilization in MBS prices, and interest rates over the last few weeks, we can likely safely conclude that book value at the moment has stabilized as well. Therefore, it is likely we are still trading at a significant discount to book value, and thus we have a buying opportunity in the name still.
The Fed Is No Reason to Worry
As we can see, AGNC can stand on its own two feet. It was a transitional quarter and being a shareholder has been painful. I began accumulating and completing a position on the way down. During this time, a lot of criticisms I received were surrounding the Fed and how devastating its exit will be. Let me be clear: Upon the release of the June FOMC meeting minutes, combined with Ben Bernanke's comments in Boston following their release, it is clear that every member except one had advocated for an extension of the Fed's current economic stimulus program. This week the Fed met once again, and their accommodative stance remains in place because the economic data just isn't that strong.
The Fed is not advocating for tapering of asset purchases ahead of stable economic news and/or meeting the economic goals laid out when the program was announced. So the fears of this issue that partially punished the mREITs are simply unfounded right now. Among the most important takeaways is that FOMC was adamant that the low-rate situation, or the zero rate interest policy (ZIRP), will not change until the unemployment rate drops to 6.5%. This is not likely until late 2014 or 2015. Furthermore, Ben Bernanke said that the current unemployment rate of 7.6% might be overstating the "health of the labor market," and as such "highly accommodative monetary policy for the foreseeable future is what's needed."
Conclusion
The quarter was tough, no doubt about it. The big headlines from earnings were pretty nasty in terms of the losses. However, two of the most important items to consider with the mREITs were reported to be strong by AGNC. First was the interest rate spread. While it did not rise as I thought it would, it didn't decline really either. It remained stagnant, but profitable nonetheless. Second was book value, the measure of which should properly determine the share price of your mREIT and be used as a basis for deciding whether to buy or sell. It declined far less than expected. As such, shares were undervalued on June 30, and are certainly still undervalued. With this evidence and two transitional quarters behind us, let's be honest -- AGNC is a buy at these level

ETRACS 2xLeveraged Long Wells Fargo Business Development Company Index ETN

2xLeveraged Long Wells Fargo Business D (THM Price: 27.68 USD Chg. (in%): -0.37 USD (-1.32%) Volume:3'500 
ETRACS 2xLeveraged Long Wells Fargo Business Development Company Index ETN
Symbol:BDCLType:Others OptimisationIndustry: 
Valor:13091232Domicile:Vereinigte StaatenExchange:NASDAQ National Association of Securities Dealers Aut. Quotations